Close
Maestro LLC
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 45
  1. #1
    BoM Nov '12
    Double Corona
    JDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,215

    Default LP9 Voluminous Smoke Experiment

    Introduction
    A BOTL Zirotti started a thread entitled “What other sticks give off the voluminous smoke like LPs?” and can be found at:
    http://www.botl.org/community/forums...LPs?highlight=

    Within the thread, I ended up posting an interview with Steve Saka, President of Drew Estate, as a quotation, essentially cutting and pasting that interview as found on OLH. Within that interview, something struck me as being extremely interesting. Saka listed the reasons why Liga cigars give off a ton of smoke, but attributed to how the filler is bunched as the “single biggest factor.” The interview can be found at the end of this post.

    What I’m Reviewing
    I posted this within Domestic Cigar Review section since I want to test Saka’s statement that the bunch technique is the “single biggest factor.” Instead of commenting on a cigar’s taste profile, burn characteristics, aroma, etc, I’ll be purely reviewing its smoke output.

    The hypothesis of the bunch technique being the “single biggest factor” will be tested by eliminating the other factors that Saka attributed to Liga’s smoke output, like “Oils in the wrapper,” and “mojo to wet the leaves…” “[during] fermentation in the pilon” from the wrapper and binder leaf. I am going to try to isolate the filler from the binder and wrapper and qualitatively determine how much less smoke the cigar produces by simply asking people’s opinion. Unfortunately, I could not figure out a quantitative way to measure the smoke output differences.

    Review Experiments
    Experiment 1 – Remove the Connecticut Broadleaf Maduro wrapper from a Liga Privada No. 9 and replace it with an Ecuadorian Connecticut. Have a BOTL smoke the Ecuador Connecticut and an untouched LP9 of the same size and ask their opinion on smoke output differences.

    The goal of experiment 1 is to determine the smoke output differences when the wrapper is replaced.

    Experiment 2 – Remove the Connecticut Broadleaf Maduro wrapper from a Liga Privada No. 9 and replace it with an Ecuadorian Connecticut; remove the Brazilian Mata Fina binder and replace it with a Brazilian Arapiraca binder. Have a BOTL smoke the Ecuador Connecticut and an untouched LP9 of the same size and ask their opinion on smoke output differences.

    The goal of experiment 2 is to determine the smoke output differences when the wrapper and binder are replaced, isolating the filler.

    Experiment Preparation Photos and Basic Explanation

    For the Experiment 1 cigar, the wrapper is removed from a LP 9. A small amount of water is spayed on the leaf half of an Ecuadorian Connecticut and trimmed using a chaveta. As he is rolling the new wrapper on the bunch, you can see how he stretches the wrapper leaf slightly. I didn’t take any photos of how he prepared and affixed the cap to the cigar.


    For the Experiment 2 cigar, the wrapper and binder are removed from a LP 9, which can be seen in the photograph on the left. He put the new binder on the cigar and prior to putting on the wrapper, he places the bunch in a cigar mold for about 45 minutes. The process of putting on the wrapper is similar to the Experiment 1 cigar.


    I would be remiss if I didn’t thank my buddy Dirick for his work in preparing these cigars. There are a few photos comparing the Experiment cigars to their true LP9 counterpart.

    Reference
    Quote Originally Posted by interview with Steve Saka , OLH

    Steve Saka of Drew Estates on why the LP9 smokes so profusely while lit and resting. I asked this question in another forum and he answered. It's interesting...

    Saka: I been meaning to answer this, even tried to but my computer locked up and I had to get a plane...

    Q: Why do Liga Privadas and Undercrowns create so much smoke and stay burning?
    There are more than a few things at play that result in why these cigars burn as they do.

    1: Oil in the wrappers - in the case of all current LPs we utilize the thickest, most oily wrapper possible. We actually harvest and cure with the intent of the leaf being uber-oily which results in the tremendous production delays due to fermentation time required. Even our Otopan capa on the Undercrown is very thick when compared to other SAN leaves due to its intentional late harvest, longer cure and ferment times.

    2: During fermentation in the pilon we introduce even more oils as a result of using a mojo to wet the leaves from water that has been steeped in tobacco stems. For our traditional cigars we ONLY utilize black tobacco and water.

    3. Very well aged fillers are all we use in the LP blends.

    4. We are very careful when blending to create not only recipes that taste good and smell delish, but to utilize materials that work well together. Combustion in our opinion is a cornerstone of achieving consistent flavor, so while wrapper x with binder y and filler z might taste great together, but if they don't burn well together there will come a time when they taste like something else. We want people to taste the blend the way we intended, therefore we must select materials that when combined create a scenario for consistent burn.

    5. And probably the single biggest factor: How our liga pairs hand bunch our cigars.

    There are 2 primary methods of hand bunching: Entubado and Estrujado

    Entubado - aka Entubar, is a method where the filler tobacco is rolled into relatively tight tubes of tobacco and then laid into the bunch. This is the often called the "Cuban" method.

    Estrujado - is a method where the leaves are folded over onto themselves and laid into the bunch. This method is utilized in the DR and Central America.

    FYI - there are Nicaraguan factories that roll entubado and Cuban factories that roll estrujado - so you really can't generalized as a country of origin thing.
    Now from here on DOWN this is ALL MY OPINION ONLY and every cigar maker will have their own opinion about the below.
    There are benefits and downsides to each of the two primary methodology of hand bunching techniques.

    Entubado - tubing the filler allows for great air channels and draw (when done right - regretfully many Cuban factories suck at their technique) but can result in funny burn patterns if the fillers do not burn at near identical rates... for example every see a cigar with like a nail spike of tobacco sticking out that is burning slower than the rest of the cigar? This is a perfect example of a entubado rolled cigar with slow burning ligero... And once the tobaccos are not burning together relatively evenly, the blend no longer tastes right.

    Estrujado - the folding of the leaf allows typically for a better burn because unlike the entubado method, the end result is each of the filler leaves have more surface area contact with their neighboring leaves in the bunch which allows for the quicker burning ones to help along the slower burning ones which ultimately creates a better burn and a more consistent tasting blend. The downside to estrujado is it a method that can be rush through and result in a uneven burning cigars because the bunchero got too many of the folds to one side, aka booking, plus just a little bit too much leaf and the draw deteriorates quickly.

    Now when both methods are implemented properly both are capable of producing an exceptional handmade cigar, but in my opinion both methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses. So when we were developing the first Liga Privada cigars we began working on a new methodology of hand bunching cigars to take the best properties of both methods while minimizing the negatives.

    Essentially it is style where we roll the fillers in entubado-style, but in very loose, wide tubes of leaf then fold those in estrujado style into the hand which contains a "base' leaf that acts almost like a second binder leaf, but is actually part of the filler blend. We then break off the tips of the long leaf bunch and backfill the body of the bunch to get even compression throughout its length.

    I often refer to this as "lazy entubado", JD typically refers to it as Escuado.

    This hybrid method of hand bunching cigars is extremely time consuming and requires even our very best buncheros an additional six months to learn. Plus they must have a great sense of feel because by utilizing the the backfill we are essentially giving them the ability to micro-adjust each and every bunch by touch.

    The resulting cigars end up being densely packed yet exhibit an amazingly effortless draw while burning and will burn not only more evenly, but longer left resting than others.

    Our unique Escudao method produces, in my opinion, the very best burning, drawing and consistent tasting cigars possible. No other factory employs our methodology, yet...
    So there you have it, this is why our LPs and UCs produce that never ending cloud of sweet, sweet smoke and burn like a mofo, yet remain dense and delish.
    I hope this answers everyone's question, now I gotta run and go rake leaves before it snows again!

    BR,

    Steve

    Still Prez, Drew Estate

  2. #2
    BoM Nov '12
    Double Corona
    JDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,215

    Default Experiment 1

    Introduction
    Again instead of commenting on a cigar’s taste profile, burn characteristics, aroma, etc, we’ll be purely reviewing its smoke output. For Experiment 1 the Connecticut Broadleaf Maduro wrapper from a Liga Privada No. 9 was removed and replaced with an Ecuadorian Connecticut. I ended up smoking the Ecuador Connecticut Experiment 1 cigar and W.B. smoked the untouched LP9 of the same size.

    Overall Smoke Output Opinions
    We will communicate the smoke output as a relative percent difference against an untouched Liga Privada No. 9, which is the reference point. Therefore, if the Experiment 1 cigar produces a third less smoke output as an untouched Liga Privada No 9 then its output is approximately 33% less. The smoke output will be observed throughout the smoke experience but an opinion will be captured at the first, second, and final third.



    Percent Difference Opinion W.B. JDog
    First Third 20-25% less 20% less
    Second Third 15-20% less 30% less
    Final Third 20% less 20% less

    Thoughts
    The general consensus is the wrapper change resulted in approximately 20% less smoke output. W.B. observed that the untouched LP9 had oiliness to the wrapper that appeared just under the burn line. It had a “wet” appearance but not a “wet” texture to the touch. This oiliness burn phenomena was not present with the Experiment 1 cigar. Both of us noticed how the smoke seemed to dissipate more quickly with the Experiment 1 cigar and how the untouched LP 9’s smoke seemed thicker and rose higher to the ceiling. For Experiment 1, it’s our opinion that the oiliness between the wrappers probably contributed the most to the smoke output differences.

    I can’t wait to light-up the Experiment 2 cigar.
    Last edited by JDog; 08-09-2012 at 11:49 AM.

  3. #3
    BoM Nov '12
    Double Corona
    JDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,215

    Default Experiment 2

    Introduction
    As stated earlier, we are only reviewing the cigar smoke output, not its taste profile, burn characteristics, aroma, etc. For the Experiment 2 cigar, the Connect Broadleaf Maduro wrapper is replaced with an Ecuadorian Connecticut, similar to the Experiment 1 cigar. But the Experiment 2 cigar also has a different binder: we removed the Brazilian Mata Fina binder and replace it with a Brazilian Arapiraca binder.

    W.B. smoked the Experiment 2 cigar that has Ecuador Connecticut wrapper with Arapiraca binder. I smoked the untouched LP9.

    Overall Smoke Output Opinions
    We will communicate the smoke output as a relative percent difference against an untouched Liga Privada No. 9, which is the reference point. Therefore, if the Experiment 2 cigar produces a third less smoke output as an untouched Liga Privada No 9 then its output is approximately 33% less. The smoke output will be observed throughout the smoke experience but an opinion will be captured at the first, second, and final third.

    W.B. and I both recorded our smoke output observations on separate pieces of paper and purposely didn’t mention our observations until we turned in the results after we finished our respective cigar. This was done to eliminate any form of bias that can possibility occur if we shared our opinions while we smoked.



    Percent Difference Opinion W.B. JDog
    First Third 40% less 50% less
    Second Third 20-30% less 30-40% less
    Final Third 30% less 30% less

    Thoughts
    The general consensus is the wrapper and binder change resulted in approximately 30% less smoke output. We attempted to test the hypothesis that the bunch technique is the “single biggest factor” to why a Liga Privada No 9 generates a lot of smoke by replacing the wrapper and binder to isolate the filler. Our experiment suggests that the bunch technique may be the “single biggest factor.”

    Admittedly, we didn’t compare the Experiment 2 cigar smoke output to any other cigar. What does it mean when people say the Liga Privada No. 9 generates a lot of smoke? We’re naturally comparing it to something. For example, we could have compared the Experiment 1 and 2 cigars’ smoke output to a cigar that generates a more normal level of smoke, in addition to the comparison to an untouched Liga Privada No. 9. Hindsight is always 20/20; if I had a mulligan or redo, I would have certainly tried to introduce a third cigar (normal level of smoke output) to illustrate how much more or less smoke the Experiment cigars generate when compared to it. That said we believe the Experiment 2 cigar still generated a lot of smoke.

    The experiment isn’t definitive… But it was a lot of fun! Thank you for taking the time to read and for the comments.

    PLEASE NOTE: I still have an Experiment and untouched No. 9 cigar. If anyone is interested in performing this experiment yourself, please PM me. There are 2 requirements: 1) you need to meet-up with a fellow BOTL to smoke the cigars and 2) post your conclusions within the thread. Pictures would be nice, but are not necessary.
    Last edited by JDog; 09-10-2012 at 10:08 PM.

  4. #4

    Robusto
    Texas Holdem Poker Champion Ecks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Epping, nh
    Posts
    836

    Default

    Sounds exciting. Looking forward to discovered answers!
    “A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the American League box scores.” – M*A*S*H, Klinger, Bug-Out 1976

  5. #5
    BoM January 2010
    Cognoscenti
    njstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Misawa AB, Japan
    Posts
    7,959

    Default

    VERY cool experiment, Jdog! Can't wait to see the results.

  6. #6
    Double Corona daniyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    4,239

    Default

    I'm more interested to see you re-wrap the cigars.

  7. #7

    Double Corona
    SDShark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,441

    Default

    Awesome experiment!
    "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi

  8. #8
    BoM July '12
    Moderator
    javajunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    top of kentucky
    Posts
    4,326

    Default

    that is crazy, man, and good on you for coming up with that! i will be keeping my eyes peeled for the results.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gravity View Post
    Anyway, this is all entirely the opinion of some dude on a cigar forum, take and leave what you like.

  9. #9
    Conn. Broadleaf Slayer
    Robusto
    Tobacco Giant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    971

    Default

    This should be really cool. And you could double the experiment to see how much the wrapper affects the flavor of the cigar (an age old debate).

    Really cool, J, thanks for posting and I'll be following!

  10. #10
    USCG Cigar Newb Churchill USCG Cigar Newb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Nassau, Bahamas
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    Wow impressed and cant wait to see the results. Ha, I dont think that I could have brought myself to use my LP 9s for an experiment.
    -Bryce
    "He is no fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose" -Jim Elliot, missionary martyr
    "I cannot and will not recant anything, for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. Here I stand, I can do no other, so help me God. Amen."-Martin Luther
    “Prayer is not a preparation for the battle; it is the battle!”– Leonard Ravenhill

  11. #11
    BoM July '12
    Moderator
    javajunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    top of kentucky
    Posts
    4,326

    Default

    actually, anyone interested in how opus would fare with CBL? o)

    while we are doing crazy things... FOR SCIENCE!
    Quote Originally Posted by Gravity View Post
    Anyway, this is all entirely the opinion of some dude on a cigar forum, take and leave what you like.

  12. #12
    Cigar Ninja!
    Corona
    lilninjabuddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by javajunkie View Post
    actually, anyone interested in how opus would fare with CBL? o)

    while we are doing crazy things... FOR SCIENCE!
    I'm VERY interested in that!
    When I have found intense pain relieved, a weary brain soothed, and calm, refreshing sleep obtained by a cigar, I have felt grateful to God, and have praised His name! -Spurgeon

  13. #13
    batsh!t crazy Petite Corona Nemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by javajunkie View Post
    actually, anyone interested in how opus would fare with CBL? o)

    while we are doing crazy things... FOR SCIENCE!
    I love science!! Please don't tempt me.... I don't know, scratch that, I definitely couldn't do that to a LP, much less an Opus.


    from javajunkie:
    if it tastes of tomato and basil, am i ripping off italy? and, more imortantly, if it is delicious, does it matter?

    fat kid logic!

  14. #14
    Conn. Broadleaf Slayer
    Robusto
    Tobacco Giant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by javajunkie View Post
    actually, anyone interested in how opus would fare with CBL? o)

    while we are doing crazy things... FOR SCIENCE!
    You sir, just blew my mind!

    If I was at all confident in my ability to remove and re-roll the wrappers, I would try it. Unfortunately, I'm not at all confident.

  15. #15

    Churchill
    CO Smokes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    1,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by javajunkie View Post
    actually, anyone interested in how opus would fare with CBL? o)

    while we are doing crazy things... FOR SCIENCE!
    Forgive my ignorance but isn't that pretty much an Añejo? Either way sounds tasty as hell...

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 08:48 PM
  2. Experiment - java
    By ItalianCustom in forum General discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-26-2012, 02:38 PM
  3. 3 Year Experiment...
    By David in forum Cigars
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-20-2007, 07:38 PM
  4. Squid's Mold Experiment
    By architeuthis in forum Cigars
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 07:29 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Federal Cigar