What's new

Barclay Rex 100th Anniversary Review

r3db4r0n

BoM Jan '11
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,190
Location
Ontario, Canada
Barclay rex 100th Anniversary

Like the name implies, the Barclay Rex 100th Anniversary was produced by Tatuaje as part of its “Exclusive Series” to celebrate the shops 100th year in business. As for the specifics of this cigar, this is a Toro measuring in at 6x52 with a blend consisting of a Nicaraguan binder, filler and a Connecticut Broadleaf wrapper. The release it self was limited to Barclay Rex: Fine Tobacconists with only 195 cabinets of 25 for a total of just 4,875 cigars.

The Barclay Rex is relatively unique in that it has been wrapped in Connecticut Broad in addition to having both a covered foot and nippled head. As for its appearance, the deep, rich, dark, oily tones of the Connecticut Broad leaf shine deeply in the light of my desk lamp, although, this particular cigar doesn't appear to have the toothy look I've seen on other Tatuajes with broadleaf. In fact, the wrapper is silky smooth, there isn't allot of veining, discolouration or patches to be found, not that I would expect anything less from an exclusive release. As for the construction, this cigar has more heft in the hand than I've felt in a long while, its just solid, hopefully this is a good sign of things to come.



Pre-light: Both the body and foot share but a hint of aroma, an aspect which surprises me as it is rather uncharacteristic of Nicaraguan tobacco or most Tatuaje Cigars. What I can sense however are mostly fragrances of barnyard, cedar, earth and spicy hints. After clipping the cap, the draw is also muted and rather tight keeping to flavours of mild tobacco, cedar and perhaps a hint of spice.



Light: The light took a little longer than normal for a close footed cigar, but after about a minute or two I found myself successful. The draw caught me off guard in a number of ways, first off it produced poorer than normal volumes of smoke than I would expect from a Tatuaje LE. Secondly, the notes from the draw weren't nearly as powerful as I'd heard reports of, instead smooth and cool notes of semi-sweet cocoa, earth, roasted nuts and just a touch of spice are present. The aroma from the lit foot is fantastic, cocoa, vanilla, cinnamon overwhelm the nose – a treat for the senses.



First Third: 20 minutes in and the draw has loosened up somewhat, although the smoke output isn't great, however the flavour profile doesn't appear to suffer. Overall things are still relatively mild throughout the first third, notes of semi-sweet cocoa, earth and spice are abound, roughly the same as the light but pleasant. When taken in, the expelled smoke offers velvety cocoa nuances, some espresso, leather and earth – actually rather complex and quite strong for the first third, but welcomed nonetheless. Construction at the end of the first third is great, the burn has kept a nice sharp edge and held onto almost two inches of ash, thus far things are looking good.







Second Third: About mid way through the second third, I can finally feel a tangible shift in the body and flavour of this cigar. Semi-sweet cocoa has faded to a dark chocolatesque note followed by heaping mounds of earth, espresso and spice. Taking expelled smoke in through the nose again reveals fragrances of dark chocolate, espresso and more leather with spice in tow that seems to pair more fittingly now with the draw. The burn near to the end of final third is unfortunately not great, while some blistering was apparent at the onset of the second third, the wrapper has begun to split so badly that it is now unravelling. Despite the aforementioned, the burn was relatively even and the ash held for about an inch before dropping in two even segments.







Final Third: Coming to a close, the Barclay Rex has aimed high but fallen far short of its target. Having lost most of its flavour and complexity in the final third, only spice, espresso, earth, leather and burnt tobacco remain from what I can surmise and, unfortunately, the same can be said for the retro-hale. Not bad, but just not my cup of tea. Between the lack of flavour, hot burn and the rather horrid construction issues of the latter two thirds, I've decided let the cigar die out with an inch and a half to go.



Final Thoughts: For a cigar once described as the Pork Tenderloins big brother, this really didn't live up to the hype for me. The Barclay Rex started off with great flavour and complexity showing quite a bit of promise up until the second third where the flavour profile and the cigar itself fell apart. For those that read my reviews, you know I'm usually not one to pick apart a cigar based on construction, but the terrible wrapper problems I experienced were an exception. Case and point, if you are paying $10 or more for cigar then it shouldn't blow up on you, period. In conclusion, my experience with the Barclay Rex is a great example why it's important not to get caught up in the hype surrounding a release. Before trying this cigar, I read many reviews and talked with quite a few people who had said it was great. With that said, our tastes and preferences are a subjective matter and while my palate generally tends to agree with the massses, this time it did not. However, on the same accord, just because I tried a cigar and didn't like it, that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it a shot.

Total smoking time was about two hours.



Thank you for reading.
 
Rating - 100%
58   0   0
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
3,867
Location
Joplin MO
Thanks for the great review, Shawn, and great pictures! You know, I had the same type of wrapper issues with the one I smoked for Clint's Santa Group Review, back around Dec. 13th, or so. It split as I smoked along. The one I had tended to hold together pretty well, but it was splitting up the cigar towards me, the entire time I was smoking it. Thanks again for sharing another wonderful review, brother!!
 

TheCigarKid

Cigaraholic
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
1,207
The ones I smoked haven't had any construction issues but damn were they meaty and deep! Very heavy cigar, IMO.
 
Rating - 100%
37   0   0
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
1,195
Great review, and as usual, your pics are second to none!

Sorry it ended so disappointingly.
 

danthebugman

BoM Nov '10
Rating - 100%
124   0   0
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
7,365
Location
Joplin, MO
I look forward to your reviews Shaw and when I saw the title I thought "Fuck yeah!". Didn't disappoint. Sucks that it didn't end well...it's not the first time I've heard of someone having problems like that with this cigar though :dunno:. Got one awaiting the first gloriously warm spring day...can't wait!

...this cigar has more heft in the hand than I've felt in a long while...
Uhm...:scratchhe...yeah, this just became my new signature :grin:.

Dan
 
Rating - 100%
57   0   0
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
2,758
Location
Johnsburg, IL
Great review Shawn! As far as you experience though I had almost the exact experience with this cigar except for the construction issue. I found the last 3rd was definitely missing all the luster of the rest of the cigar. I hope these come around in the future but it died on me also.
 

njstone

BoM January 2010
Rating - 100%
167   0   0
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
8,108
Location
St. Paul, MN
Thanks for sharing the "real review" even though you got a bad stick. I think you DID get a bad stick, though (assuming your palate wasn't messed-up for some reason that day), because although I've only smoked one, it was a powerhouse definately in league with the Pork Tenderloin.
 

SkinsFanLarry

Craft Beer Addict!
Rating - 100%
78   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
14,355
Thanks for the review and pic's my brother and for sharing your experience.

....you are the 2nd person I know that had the cigar literally fall apart on them while they were smoking it.
 

r3db4r0n

BoM Jan '11
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,190
Location
Ontario, Canada
I look forward to your reviews Shaw and when I saw the title I thought "Fuck yeah!". Didn't disappoint. Sucks that it didn't end well...it's not the first time I've heard of someone having problems like that with this cigar though :dunno:. Got one awaiting the first gloriously warm spring day...can't wait!
Its comments like these that really make the reviews worth it, thanks Dan and to everyone who takes the time to read and/or comment.

Also, while its somewhat unfortunate, I'm glad to see that I wasn't the only one who had wrapper issues or thought the same about the last third of this cigar.
 
Rating - 100%
62   0   0
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
45,196
Location
DC
Thanks for the review. These need rest as with any of Pete's LE's. Hopefully the issues resolve themselves in 6 months.
 

ciggy

"TommyBoy"
Rating - 100%
326   0   0
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
9,703
Location
Southwest Michigan
Wow..that's to bad my friend. I truely believe this is the best cigar of 2010 as far as limited runs go. I've never had the Tenderloin or Porkchop so I couldn't compare however I friggin loved this ciagr! You can send all of them to me for proper disposal:stretchgr
 

twenty5

BoM 11/09, 4/10 BoY '10
Rating - 100%
343   0   0
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
5,950
Location
NEPA
Thanks for the review Shawn!

This is one of my favorite cigars, I smoked mine until it burned my fingers and enjoyed every second of it!
 
Rating - 100%
99   0   0
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,809
Location
Knoxville, TN
Thanks for another great review Shawn. I was curious how many did you get to try before writing the review? So far my box has been smoking well. I have had one split on me but I associated it with bad luck. This is one of my favorite sticks that I keep going back too. Wish I had bought two boxes when I had the chance.
 

iCraig

Cigars, hockey, and beer.
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
3,213
Thanks for the review, Shawn. I'd been looking forward to it. Enjoy reading your reviews.
 
Top