Blind Cigar Review: Tatuaje | Fausto FT153 (Toro)

[rhetorik]

Blind Cigar Review: Tatuaje | Fausto FT153 (Toro)

Vital Stats:

Vitola: Toro
Length: 6″
Ring Gauge: 50
Country of Origin: Nicaragua
Wrapper: Ecuadorian Habano Maduro
Binder: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Factory: El Rey de los Habanos
Blender: Pete Johnson / Don Pepin Garcia
Number of reviewers: 5 —– Craig (WyldKnyght) Ian (Sp@rky426) Robert (NavyPiper) Sandeep (Djangos) Derek (StogieNinja)
Price: $9.00
Contributed by: Blind Man’s Puff

Initial Impressions

Appearance: 89

“Larger gauge stick here with a brindle-like pattern of light and dark brown.” -Ian (Sp@rky426)
“Rough looking stick. Rustic brown with spots wrinkles large veins. Unusual tooth large spots. Wrapper is quite textured, And not in a good way. Large stems are visible both at the foot and at the cut.” -Derek (StogieNinja)

Aroma: 89
“The aroma is a flavor that I cannot place immediately, definitely has nuances of sweet spices to it. The dry puff on the other hand was a pleasant surprise! Chocolate and sweetened cocoa and did I already mention chocolate? Also undertones of coffee are coming through.” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Construction: 89
“Definitely well made and firm to touch throughout the length of the cigar. There is not much give and no soft spots apparent pre light. The cigar is quite toothy and the veins are quite prominent.”-Sandeep (Djangos)
“Lumpy pack, with several concerning hard spots. Uneven, slightly crooked roll.” -Derek (StogieNinja)

First Third

Flavor: 89
Strength: Mild-Medium
Body/Complexity: Medium-Full

“Foot was a little squeezed, which cause some burn issue to start. Flavor was lots of sweetness with some nutty tones. Lots of thick creamy smoke. Near the end of the first 3rd I started to get a leathery flavor. Some pepper sticking to the top of my mouth and back of the throat.” -Craig (WyldKnyght)
“The cigar starts off with a veritable blast of pepper, a combination of white and black. Initially the pepper is all around in my mouth but after a few puffs is gradually settling to the back of the throat. The major flavors are chocolate and cocoa with hints of coffee. There is sweet spice flavor that I cannot place at this time. There is also a slight bitterness at the end of the draw. The smoke is thick and voluminous and the draw is close to perfect. The ash is grey to dark grey and is holding fast. Towards the end of the third the pepper is dying down. The burn was good to start off with but after about an inch has started to skew and canoe a bit. I am holding off at this time from touch ups.” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Second Third

Flavor: 89
Strength: Medium-Strong
Body/Complexity: Medium-Full

“Same nice leathery, sweet, nutty flavors, mellowed out. Burn evened out after touch up. Lots of thick creamy smoke.” -Craig (WyldKnyght)
“In this third, a nice transition into a very smoky spice, with a tangy pine flavor coming in. Very nice third, and having trouble slowing down my puffing, but its so nice that I want to practically continually puff this thing and enjoy the heck out of it! Towards the end of the third, the pepper started creeping up and a ‘nic kick’ started to come in.” -Robert (NavyPiper)
“As I enter the second third I am forced to do a touch up since the canoeing has not corrected itself and actually seems to be getting worse. The flavors are still great with a lot of chocolate and leather. The new spice flavor that I got in the first third is persisting and is giving this cigar quite the character. There are undertones of earthy flavors such as hay and dried grass. The pepper is now just in the finish and the bitterness is dying down as well. After the touch up the burn is much better. The only reason that I am giving this third a sub 90 rating is because of the burn issues (unfortunately I had to touch up once more before the end of this third).” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Final Third

Flavor: 89
Strength: Medium-Strong
Body/Complexity: Medium-Full

“Same flavors as the first and second third, but a lot mellower. Has some burn issues, but it did not take away from the flavor. Touched up the burn again.” -Craig (WyldKnyght)
“The last third is bringing less of the chocolate and the sweet spices but definitely has quite a bold character with a lot of leather and tobacco. The pepper is beginning to come back a little bit more in this third.The flavors are consistent. Fortunately the burn issues are not returning in this third and this is definitely making this third more enjoyable than the last. The smoke is just creamy and voluminous as ever. The ash seems to be holding for about three quarters of an inch before falling off. The earthy character with woodsy notes are becoming more prominent and seem to be dominating this third. Over all a very enjoyable time with the complex flavors and the strength the last inch is bringing.” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Overall Impressions

Draw: 91
“For as many stems coming out the end of this thing Im surprised it was as good as it was.” -Ian (Sp@rky426)

Burn: 87
“Burn was so-so. Pretty wavy, and even though I was having a hard time slowing down & enjoying it more, I had to touch up the burn in the 2nd & 3rd thirds. Also had to relight in both these thirds as well…” -Robert (NavyPiper)
“Unfortunately I have to dock quite a few points in this department because of the canoeing that I experienced in the first and second thirds. I had to touch this one up twice before it finally evened out in the final third.” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Overall Strength: Medium
Overall Body/Complexity: Medium-Full
Overall Experience: 89

“Overall this was a great cigar for flavor, and consistency. There were several burn issues, but that did not take away from the enjoyment of this cigar.” -Craig (WyldKnyght)
“Sadly, this cigar was a dud for me. Maybe I got a bad one in the batch or something but it was not pleasurable in the least. If this had not been for reviewing it would have gotten tossed.” -Ian (Sp@rky426)
“This was over all a very good smoke with a refreshingly complex character. The changes in flavors were quite exciting and I am still trying to figure out what the sweet spice flavor that i got in the first and second thirds. The strength was just right as well and this one would have score significantly higher had the burn been good. The canoeing and skewing definitely detracted from the experience quite a bit. I think this might have been a single cigar issue and I definitely want to give this another try.” -Sandeep (Djangos)

Smoking Time (in minutes): 97

Total Score: 89 (Good)

To view the original review with pictures, go to www.BlindMansPuff.com

 

[StogieNinja]

Whoa. I can't believe this one. I must have got a dud, I really didn't like this one at all, though I've had several in the past I really enjoyed. Surprising!

 

[rhetorik]

Whoa. I can't believe this one. I must have got a dud, I really didn't like this one at all, though I've had several in the past I really enjoyed. Surprising!

Yeah I was shocked reading your notes on this one. It actually seemed as if two reviewers got duds in this batch, not a good sign for picking up a box.

 

[KoreanCowboy]

Good review guys. I have a question on the scoring. Ian's stick was bad enough that he wanted to throw it out. In my book that means a 75 or less. That means the other 4 reviewers gave this a 94. Am I understanding that correctly? Odd that his would be so far off of the other reviews....

 

[rhetorik]

Good review guys. I have a question on the scoring. Ian's stick was bad enough that he wanted to throw it out. In my book that means a 75 or less. That means the other 4 reviewers gave this a 94. Am I understanding that correctly? Odd that his would be so far off of the other reviews....

Good question. He actually gave it an 80 overall which is a "bad" score on our site. Anything below 80 is considered bad. Here a link to the scoring system: http://www.blindmanspuff.com/about-us/how-this-works/

The reason it didn't throw off the total average is because the spreadsheet I have set up to do the scoring calculate the standard deviation of each category and removes any outliers, which in this case would be Ian's scores (and some of Derek's). At the very bottom of the review there is a link to the spreadsheet, anything highlighted in red is rows 11-15 are the outliers. Also, we weight the scores by category as follows: Appearance 10%, Aroma 5%, Construction 10%, 1/3 Flavor 10%, 2/3 Flavor 10%, 3/3 Flavor 10%, Draw 10% Burn 10%, Overall Experience 25%.

 

[StogieNinja]

It's an interesting scale, and one of the reasons I love what Emmett has set up. I thought the stick was a dog rocket, and was absolutely shocked to find out it was a Tat. But, removing the outliers prevents one experience from impacting the overall panel. So if four of us of the five rated it a dog rocket, and one guy liked it, the panel review reflects the consensus, and conversely, one guy's opinion that it was a dog rocket doesn't derail the entire panel.

 

[KoreanCowboy]

Thanks for the explanation! I'm a big "ratings" guy so I'm always very curious as to how scoring is done. This is a great way to score seeing as 1 bad stick would normally throw a rating system into chaos. Very good setup guys and thanks again for the reviews. I love reading them and every time I see one it's the first post I read. I've also read all your reviews a number of times! Keep it up!

 

[KoreanCowboy]

It's an interesting scale, and one of the reasons I love what Emmett has set up. I thought the stick was a dog rocket, and was absolutely shocked to find out it was a Tat. But, removing the outliers prevents one experience from impacting the overall panel. So if four of us of the five rated it a dog rocket, and one guy liked it, the panel review reflects the consensus, and conversely, one guy's opinion that it was a dog rocket doesn't derail the entire panel.

I actually agree with your assessment on the Fausto. I've never had 1 that I liked. Smoked 8 from a 10 pack that was half a box split so I know mine wasn't just bad luck. I just plain don't like the cigar. Glad to see I'm not the only 1!

 

[mdwest]

any of you guys have faustos sitting in your humi that you want to get rid of.... shoot me a PM and we'll work out a trade...

love those sticks!

 

[aaron72]

I think this cigar was a good experience for us as 2 out of the 5 cigars seemed to be a bit off. Seeing that, people might be able to take consistency into account when deciding how deep they want to buy in to this stick if it's something that will be new to them.

 

[Psiman]

I have had all the sizes and found the t 166 the best, but they were all from the first run in 2011. I have got the better part of a box of t 166's from the first run from June 2011 that are fantastic and remind me of how the old j 21's use to taste. Get your hands on while you can boxes of Tat 10th Ani. Noellas. They are fantastic and should age well. The best Tat'd I've tasted in a long time.