What's new

Cohiba Behike BHK 52

Docbp87

Smoke Into Oblivion
Rating - 100%
23   0   0
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
1,771
Location
Richmond, Va
COHIBA BEHIKE BHK 52
4.7 x 52




The Cohiba Behike... Ahh... the name rings true with prestige, scarcity, quality. Originally the Behike name was used for the Cohiba 40th anniversary cigar, a 7.6x52 mammoth, rolled entirely by one roller, packaged in gorgeous custom humidors of 40 cigars, with only 100 humidors total being made. These cigars fetch well over $1,000 US EACH today. Starting in 2010 however, Habanos released an entirely new line of regular (albeit annually limited) production cigars under the Cohiba marca, the Behike BHK series. Available in three sizes, the BHK line makes use of the Medio Tiempo leaf, a small pair of leaves that sometimes (and not always) appear at the very top of a tobacco plant, apparently imbuing the BHK with a unique flavor element. The Medio Tiempo is a component that had fallen out of use in Cuban cigar production, often sorted in with the rest of the ligero, or discarded entirely, because it is small, and only occasionally appears on a plant. The folks responsible for the BHK came upon the medio tiempo in old blend books, and decided to reinstate it, and thus the Behike BHK was born. The BHK 52, the smallest size, was named Cigar Aficionado's cigar of the year for 2010, and has received great praise (or hype?) since coming to market in early 2010. Having just celebrated a birthday, I figured it was as good an excuse as any to light one, and give it a really close, in depth look.

This particular example of the BHK 52 features a caramel brown wrapper, with a dusting of tooth, and almost no visible veins. The flag tailed cap is beautifully, evenly applied, and the general construction, as Cohiba should be, is pretty much flawless to look at. In the hand it is fully packed, but light, firm to squeeze, but not hard. The aroma from the foot is a gentle toasty tobacco, with just a slight hay and dirt to it. The draw offers just a slight snug resistance, and tastes of hay, cream, almonds, and a very slight honey. A quick bit about the band, which is absolutely gorgeous, in its intense contrasting black and white, with beautiful gold accents and lettering, as well as the holograms which not only serve as aesthetic embellishment, but also as a counterfeiting deterrent.

Lit at 2:40pm

Right away the flavors explode on the palate, though it is not an overly strong cigar, or full in body, the tastebuds are greeted with a dark caramel and sweet hay, followed by leather, and finally a little cinnamon spice, that lingers through a long, cedar and almond finish. This particular stick may be just a TOUCH under humidified, as the wrapper seems a little delicate. The burn ran a touch for the first few draws but within about 10 minutes everything has sorted itself out to an even line. The draw is great, and smoke production is... voluminous. The finish seems to have actually gotten spicier, more heat involved, just over the course of the first third. The ash is dark, mostly black, and dense. It has held already for over an inch, and not yet fallen.

Getting near the halfway mark the mouthfeel has gotten thicker, like a fresh, whipped cream. The flavor profile has also taken on a woodier, nuttier character than was present at the beginning. There is still a sweet cream and honey on the draw, but they quickly move into a slightly tangy cedar, and roasted almond, with a cinnamon and pepper on the finish that is maybe just a little rougher around the edges than I expected. That said, these are still not very old cigars (September 2010), and Cohiba as a rule seems to benefit from at least two or three years, so I would say this is actually performing wonderfully.

Moving to the final third, things sort of ramp up a bit. The flavor profile gets darker, with caramel getting a touch burnt, the cream and honey fading, a bit of leather becoming more apparent, and the almonds getting roasted a little darker. A little dark chocolate also joins the mix for good measure seemingly, which is a nice addition, and adds some certain complexity to things. The draw remains open but firm, and smoke production continues to be outstanding. The burn line throughout the cigar has wavered at times, getting crazy for a few draws before eventually evening back out. The ash continues to hold for pretty much an entire third of the cigar at a time. The finish has gotten significantly spicier, a little bit of hot pepper, balanced by cinnamon and/or nutmeg at times, really bringing everything together.

In the end the only thing I can think is that I wish I had more of these on hand, to really be able to see where they go in a year, or three, or five. The BHK 52 is smoking beautifully right now, with a touch of youth popping up here and there, but ultimately, it already has achieved a phenomenal balance of flavor, body, and feel, and in my opinion has the potential to only get better from here. I only pray that they continue to maintain this level of quality in the future. Ended at 4pm on the dot, for a total smoke time of one hour twenty minutes. I wish that maybe it had burned slower, but it is also a little cold out today, so my finger tips are glad it is a shorter vitola.
 
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
Joined
Jul 15, 2011
Messages
761
Location
Massachusetts
Sounds like a damn fine stick and review. I have not been so fortunate as to get one yet but I hope mine will be half the stick yours was!
 

njstone

BoM January 2010
Rating - 100%
167   0   0
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
8,108
Location
St. Paul, MN
Nice review! I've had the 52, it was great for a young Habano, but I'd like to see it with some more age. I had a 54 this week (my first) that was about a year old, and that thing was phenomenal. Best young Habano I've ever had, and the best Cohiba I've had as well. I didn't get the spiciness from it that I got in the 52, though.

I obviously haven't had enough to do an adequate comparison between the two ... for those who have, are the 54 and 56 very similar to these 52s, just longer smoking time?
 
Rating - 100%
62   0   0
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
45,198
Location
DC
Nice Review. I've only had a couple of the 52's and honestly for the price tag I'd rather have Sig VI ORs at this time.
 
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
Joined
Jul 15, 2011
Messages
761
Location
Massachusetts
I obviously haven't had enough to do an adequate comparison between the two ... for those who have, are the 54 and 56 very similar to these 52s, just longer smoking time?
According to what I have read (from CA and the like) the 52 is consistently the higher scoring vitola. But this is all second hand info. I have yet to find or try these for myself.
 

Skitalets

Laguito No. 2
Rating - 100%
73   0   0
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
1,341
According to what I have read (from CA and the like) the 52 is consistently the higher scoring vitola. But this is all second hand info. I have yet to find or try these for myself.
CA scored it higher, but I don't think it's consistently higher scoring elsewhere. I was underwhelmed by the BHK 52, and when I posted my review a few months back, several brothers said the 54 was more impressive.
 
Rating - 100%
17   0   0
Joined
Jul 15, 2011
Messages
761
Location
Massachusetts
Thanks for the first hand info. One day I will be sure to post a review and chime in. I may be old and grey by then but I shall do it.
 

SuprHasan

I'm finished with cigars
Rating - 100%
53   0   0
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
1,361
Doc, excellent review, as is your standard.

....... I have yet to find or try these for myself.

I'd put up a link to an online retailer here in Australia who has them on sale right now for a bargain price, but posting links to Cuban cigar retailer is not allowed.
If you really want one, or a box, they're VERY EASY to track down.
 

Xingpao

Tobacco Whore
Rating - 100%
22   0   0
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
629
Location
Nashville
Somehow I expected a positive review, but nice job capturing the smoke.

"phenomenal balance of flavor, body, and feel"
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
287
Location
Abu Dhabu, UAE
Very nice review. Ive tried all the sizes and found this one to be the best out of them which is direct to the point.
 
Top