What's new
  • BOTL UPCOMING MAINTENANCE

    Hi Everyone, as mentioned in my introduction post, BOTL needs quite a bit of updating, patching and whatever else I might come across. Over the next few weekends BOTL may be unreachable on occasion as I do migrations or updates, etc. Just be patient - we'll be back! I'll generally try to keep these maintenances until later in the evenings.

RYJ wide Churchill

Rating - 100%
16   0   0
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
710
Location
TX
Down to my last few from an original release 2010 box. These cigars were good fresh and have gotten even better with the little bit of age on them. Construction of the cigars have all been top notch, both in boxes from overseas as well as from IEPT. Like others I am not a fan of hsa getting rid of old favorites in order to produce 'jawbreakers' or über hard to find regionals or Ed LEDs.....but there is a place IMO for these in any smokers line up.

What I like about these smokes is the same thing I have been finding during my recent exploration of domestic cigars. No draw issues on ANY of the 75 or so that I have smoked. The bunch in all of the visible feet have looked similar and are neither under or overfilled. All of the cigars through the multiple boxes have the same taste profile. All have looked visually appealing.

Sure these aren't pepper bombs. Or change that much while you smoke them down. But they do provide a pleasing amount of smoke with cedar and a bit of spice when exhaled through the nose. I believe that when the blender has more filler to work with a more balanced and consistant flavor can be achieved...more room for blender error. Also with these bigger ring gauges there is less chance of getting tent pegs or uneven burns. Obviously there is more secco and less ligero in this wide Churchill then say a RYJ Churchill, which makes it a mild to medium cigar. It's not like your smoking paper you can still tell its a cuban cigar for sure.

After smoking this cigar I understand, or at least think I do lol, where HSA is heading with these bigger ring gauge smokes.

Mikes
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
14
Hey! I tried one of these a few weeks back, i bought two as i'd seen some good reviews. Couldn't agree more about them not really changing much though!! They were a bit too cedar-like for me as i'm more into a smoother smoke. The second stick was rolled too toght however. But like you said.. You've had plenty of chances to get an over-tight RYJWC so you've had a lucky streak and i took out the bad one! Haha. I could see this being a nice daily smoke. Rather take on a Bolivar Royal Coronas though. Similar experience, without the jaw ache!
@habanosAl
 
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
1,822
Location
PA
Mikes,

I smoked a couple when they were first released. I smoked them fresh and was underwhelmed.

I've recently burnt through two 10-ct. boxes with 2012 box codes and they have ALL been consistent and delicious. I've given them no time to age and right off the bat they are complex, smooth, and have a nice white pepper note throughout. Mine have required a few touch ups during the burn but nothing drastic.

To anyone looking for a Cuban that's great right off the truck - this is the one.
 
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
1,822
Location
PA
How do these compare to the short churchills? Just snagged a box of the shorts.
Personally, I find the Wide Churchill's flavors to be more pronounced and complex. The Short Churchill is a great cigar, don't get me wrong, but I give the nod to the Wide Churchill.
 
Top