What's new
  • BOTL UPCOMING MAINTENANCE

    Hi Everyone, as mentioned in my introduction post, BOTL needs quite a bit of updating, patching and whatever else I might come across. Over time BOTL may be unreachable on occasion as I do migrations or updates, etc. Just be patient - we'll be back! I'll generally try to keep these maintenances until later in the evenings.

Padron Anniversary 1926 Maduro Review

Rating - 100%
29   0   0
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
1,868
Location
PA
Padron Anniversary 1926 Maduro No. 1

Note: I went 'picture-happy' with this review. There are a lot of photos in this post.


This cigar was gifted to me by a very nice, older gentleman at my local cigar shop. It's been resting in my humidor for a couple of months and I thought I'd bring it with me on my recent trip to my Dad's house. I brought two other cigars just in case...



Construction:

Impeccable. This cigar just screams, "Quality!" It's firm... but not too firm; much like the Padron Anniversary 1964 it has a little give when squeezed. Some small veins litter the dark chocolate-colored wrapper.

It didn't present any burn problems at all. After the initial torch, it was off and ready to go.



Right into the first third, the Padron 1926 is a delight. The draw is effortless, the burn is perfect, and the flavors are complex and delicious.

I picked up hints of toasted nuts, cedar, and some pretty powerful spice.







As the cigar kept burning, I was amazed by the ash. It was a little flakey, but managed to stay on for about an inch and a half.

The second third was just as good as the first. The power dies down a little bit and settles into more of a medium-bodied smoke. The flavors are still rich and complex, and the burn is still excellent.









(Crooked Ash)


(The Sun!)


As the cigar winds down into the final third, I begin to cry. I didn't want it to end (even though it was freezing outside).

The flavors are pretty consistent from the second third: some cedar notes, toasted nuts, coffee, and a hint of spice. Delicious.



Overall:

Padrons get away with being expensive for a reason -- they're worth it. The Padron Anniversary 1926 Maduro is well constructed and delicious. If you're looking for a medium to full-bodied smoke that will last you a couple of hours and features complex flavors, then this is it.
 

TheCigarKid

Cigaraholic
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
1,207
Nice review, I have a couple #1's waiting for when I have a some time on my hands :) Can't go wrong w/ a 1926. They all seem to be great.
 

njstone

BoM January 2010
Rating - 100%
167   0   0
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
8,110
Location
St. Paul, MN
Awesome pics and review, thanks bro!

I've never had a '26 -- how do they differ from the '64? I had a '64 Principe today--awesome cigar.

I REALLY need to get a pair of burnin' gloves!
 
Rating - 100%
106   0   0
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
2,408
Location
PA
Awesome pics and review, thanks bro!

I've never had a '26 -- how do they differ from the '64? I had a '64 Principe today--awesome cigar.

I REALLY need to get a pair of burnin' gloves!
Never a 26!! Send me your addy I can fix that for you.
 
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
1,868
Location
PA
Awesome pics and review, thanks bro!

I've never had a '26 -- how do they differ from the '64? I had a '64 Principe today--awesome cigar.

I REALLY need to get a pair of burnin' gloves!
They're a lot stronger than the 1964. As for taste, I can't really tell you because it's been so long since I've had a '64. But I do recall them being just as complex as the '26.
 

SkinsFanLarry

Craft Beer Addict!
Rating - 100%
78   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
14,355
Very good review and pic's my brother! :thumbsup:

I have always thought the '26's were smooth and rich and the '64's were bold and rich.
 

dpricenator

BoM March 08
Rating - 100%
175   0   3
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
14,899
Location
The OC
I dig the pics bro. I love me some Padron's but my fav is the PAM 64. The 26 is a bit too strong for me, though I do enjoy them. If you haven't had the Pam 64 Pyramid, you gotta try it. I lOVE THAT CIGAR.
 

TheCigarKid

Cigaraholic
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
1,207
Never a 26!! Send me your addy I can fix that for you.
I was just gonna' say... Never tried, WHAT! 1926 is one of my favorite cigars.
Very good review and pic's my brother! :thumbsup:

I have always thought the '26's were smooth and rich and the '64's were bold and rich.
I basically have to agree w/ this. The 1926 are fuller body, but so smooth and clean w/ a complex yet consistent flavor, if that makes sense. 1964 has more of a bite to it, and isn't as consistent as the '26. '64 seems to be spicier, and more in your face. Both are GREAT, none the less, can't go wrong with either one. Speaking of which, I'm going to be smoking a #35 our friend ctaylor sent me, on the drive to my buddies house :) Thanks again, Chris!
 
Top