What's new

Aged Padrons

Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
89
I started a new thread on this b/c I've recently acquired a box of 5000 Maduro's from 2001. Oddly enough, they smell like chocolate. They really, actually, no-kidding, smell like chocolate. They're not even box pressed anymore. I smoked one yesterday and will be posting up the review soon. It's definitely not the same cigar. It's much more mellow than any Padron maduro I've had, but still a good smoke.







On a side note, my brother found a box of 1964 Exclusivo Maduro buried in his cooler that he and I had bought together back in 2005. There was one cigar left inside! He smoked it tonight while we watched UFC 125. I got a few puffs out of it. It burned razor sharp (like all high end Padrons tend to) and tasted amazing. He was trying to see how long he could keep the ash from falling. He got about 3 inches in before it finally let go. I found it interesting b/c I remember the 1964's getting blandish after about 1 or 2 years. Now, I'll have to revisit that thought since I'm wondering if that bland period is just a "sick" period. Good thing I still have half a box of my own Principe maduros to find out. :grin:

 

danthebugman

BoM Nov '10
Rating - 100%
124   0   0
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
7,365
Location
Joplin, MO
A quick search will yield you several posts about aging Padrons. That's a sick find my friend :thumbsup:. I can't seem to let them set in my humi very long so finding a box that had already been aged would be the only way I could get my hands on some :laugh:.

Dan
 

SkinsFanLarry

Craft Beer Addict!
Rating - 100%
78   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
14,355
In my opinion that is a stunning find! :thumbsup:

I have found that any size within the 1,000 Series aged two years or more just smokes wonderfully! :cbig:
 
Rating - 100%
68   0   1
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
1,233
Location
USA
I have an full box of 3000 mads from 2006 or 2007 I think. These date stamped? I need to check when I get home. Hmmmm
 
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
1,032
Location
Massachusetts
Aged or not they are a fantastic cigar. They definitely have different characteristics but I couldn't say which I prefer more. They smoke great at the time of purchase or a couple years later.

Padron's #1
 

ciggy

"TommyBoy"
Rating - 100%
326   0   0
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
9,703
Location
Southwest Michigan
I will agree that the X000 line is great with some age I still say that the Anni's loose something with age. I would rather smoke a somewhat fresh Anni but an older X000...Just my 2cents.:cbig:
 
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
89
I have an full box of 3000 mads from 2006 or 2007 I think. These date stamped? I need to check when I get home. Hmmmm
Padrons usually have a little piece of paper in the box with the buncher, roller and date.

I will agree that the X000 line is great with some age I still say that the Anni's loose something with age. I would rather smoke a somewhat fresh Anni but an older X000...Just my 2cents.:cbig:
I've also read this about their premium lines. Logically, it makes sense as well seeing as the tobacco in their Anniversary lines is already aged. Continued, or long term, aging could send them past their prime. That's why I also got a box of 2002 1964 Sampler. :drool:

 
Rating - 100%
62   0   0
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
44,884
Location
DC
If those are from the same source I looked at those same cigars. A buddy of mine got the 6000's and sent me a pic of how yellow the cello looked. The 1000's with age are great.
 
Last edited:

Thegreekone

Banned
Rating - 100%
76   0   0
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
2,576
Location
Cleveland!
I will agree that the X000 line is great with some age I still say that the Anni's loose something with age. I would rather smoke a somewhat fresh Anni but an older X000...Just my 2cents.:cbig:

+1 and then some


Sparked a 1926 serie #6 from 05 and it had lost what made those cigars special, IMO.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
7
I bought a box of the 6000's from 2000 and they were superb. I was surprised when I rated it a 94 and CA a mere 89. I figured it wouldn't be much better due to the fact that the padrons already age their tobaccos.
Any thoughts???
 
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
803
They do loose their umph after some time (as with any cigar) but the flavor and balance that they develop suits my preferences alot more. Personally not a fan of shear strength or in-your-face flavor... your tastes may differ.

I love aged padrons whether it be the x000, 64's or even 26's with a couple of years age.
 
Top