What's new

Montecristo 520 EL 2012

Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
36
Montecristo 520 EL 2012

Just around my birthday in June a BOTL managed to get this beauty over to me. Naturally, I had to smoke it ASAP! :cjump: While not officially released, there are some out in the wild. My friend won one at the LCDH dinner in February 2012. My sample is unbanded which most likely means it came off the bench. Or to some it might mean I'm full of crap. :lookaroun

Regardless, here is my review. I hope you enjoy it.


Vital stats: Maravillas No.3 55 x 155 (6.1") Robusto Extra

000.jpg

Appearance: Smooth, colorado / chocolate brown wrapper. Decent amount of oils on it.

Spongy, no hard spots. Slight vein or two otherwise smooth wrapper.

Aroma: Clean tobacco, cocoa,earth.

Paired with: Villa Sandi Proscecco. (I find any kind of "bubbly" to go fantastically with cigars as they cleanse the palate without ruining the tastebuds)



I punched the cigar. Firm draw.



Start time 2:40PM EST


FIRST THIRD

Easy to light. Good draw. Not too loose. Very dark wood flavours. Creaminess coats the tongue. Hint of chocolate. Roasted nut on the finish. Aroma from the smoke is like steak. Toasty tobacco, nice grey ash and near razor like burn. The apple laden Prosecco seems to heighten the toasty tobacco flavours. Slight mineraly taste to the cigar which could be the Prosecco. Bitter chocolate flake taste. So far the punch is working out for me. I usually end up with a tar/sap bubble at the end. Smoking this a bit slow as to not overhead it. Cocoa flavour. Nice heavy earthy tones. Reminiscent of molasses. And for some reason I taste dark rum? A nice tangy taste to the cigar. Dark grey / light grey banded ash. Roasted nut on the palate, mushroom on the nose. Rich chocolate. Toasty tobacco. Almost done 1stt third. Slow burn...very nice nice smooth richness.

001.jpg




SECOND THIRD

Still nice rich earthy tobacco, some minerals. Ash still on. More cocoa hints. Quite a bit of chocolate on this 2nd third so far. Ash falls off. Too bad it was a good one. A bit flakey it seems. More minerals. Finished Prosecco a while back so it cannot be it. This is a young cigar and it reminds me a bit of the MGE. The MGE really improved over 6-10 months of sleep. The cigar has been medium bodied thus far. Tasty but not strong. Burn needed a correction. Lots of earth. Slight almond notes too. Not too much variation here. Every puff goes to earthy tones to slight bitter chocolate notes. Some nuttiness pops in here and there. Mostly almond and some dry walnut. Lots of toasty tobacco these past few draws. Mineraly finish still present. Getting some leather notes as I near the end of this third. Reminds me a bit of a PSD4. Some very rich tobacco appears. Peppery notes make their presence felt. Still some time to go before this third is over. Dark earthy flavours take over. Almost like coffee grounds without too much coffee left in it. A bit of anisette on the palate. A bit of sweetness appears. This third isn't monotonous after all. Halfway it was..next half, much better. With time this cigar can be a real winner. But its not over yet!!

002.jpg





THIRD THIRD

Very rich tobacco, some coffee. Very PSD4 like now. Some power in this last third. Not very distracting. No buzz as of yet but you can taste it. Very sneaky pepper undertones. The aroma of the cigar itself is like sauteed mushrooms. A very slight mineral finish mixing in with bitter chocolate is a bonus too. Earlthy flavours persist. Lots of toasty tobacco and toasted nuttiness in this third. Smoking like a champ. Some molasses and nougat make an appearance now. Very rich cigar. Not a nicotine hammer but delicious. More sweet notes on this third. The mineral aspects have tapered off. This is an excellent cigar thus far. The aroma coming off the cigar is intoxicating. Some almond notes pop in for a bit. Slight pepper on the finish. Not too much to say. The cigar at this point is savory and tangy. Two aspects I really enjoy. The strength of the cigar is medium, with some high notes of power but not enough to distract or spin your head. Fantastic blend. I'd love to see what this becomes with some age. Some woodsy flavours. Hmm..some very meaty draws. Steak anyone? The pepper finish has a hint of nutmeg at this point. Hints of honey and molasses these past few draws. Very nice. Hmm...ash fell off/exploded as I lifted it..oh well..still tastes good..the cigar, not the ash. -_- The punch on this cigar worked out well for me. Going to try to do it more often. Almost at the point of nubbing this sucker. Some sweeter chocolate notes now..woodsiness too, some peppery notes with earthy taste finish this off.

003.jpg

004.jpg

Great cigar! Loved it! :eek:k: I'd say these are "must try" cigars. :waving:

005.jpg


CONCLUSION


A fine cigar young it should only get better with time. Despite its' youth it had plenty of flavour and was well balanced. This is a meaty cigar. It took me over 2.5 hours to smoke. It reminded me of the MGE due to it's cocoa/chocolate notes. However, the almond nuttiness added a new dimension to the brand. It looks like the rolling of these has been going on for a while. The tobacco is two years old to begin with so by the time they get out the cigar should technically have about three years of age on them and should be ready to smoke. If I had more on hand, I would definitely dive into these sticks often.


SCORE: 91

006.jpg
 
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
610
Location
127.0.0.1
Fantastic run through brother! Wish I had one to burn too!

Side note, I am REALLY diggin your ashtray/cigar holder thingy. What is that little dude called, and where can I find one?

-Chrisso
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
36
I'm not sure what's its called but I'm told they're fairly common. They're made of pewter and come from Mexico. I paid about $90CDN. I think they're referred to as "egg tray” ashtrays.

Thanks for reading!
 
Last edited:
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
344
I smoked a 520 out on the patio before lunch today. I experienced all that bundwallah di except for the burn. It canoed quite a bit until the final third. But it was an excellent smoke. Took almost two hours to smoke. And a pleasurable two hours it was!
 

orangedog

Navin R Johnson
Rating - 100%
83   0   0
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,504
Location
On A Plane
Finally got around to smoking one of these too... and this review may be one of the first where I agree with almost every part of it.

Flaky ash - ashed in 1" or less increments, but a solid burn.
You mentioned molasses, I identified that as caramel.
Definite chocolate notes, clipping the cap release a wave of milk chocolate (as opposed to the cocoa you mentioned)
As for the nut notes... I'm leaning hazelnut but it isn't that precise, almost a mix of hazelnut and almond
Pepper sneaks in, as well as the strength
Didn't really pick up much on the "meaty" spectrum
Much better out of the gates than the MGE, but I like the rg on the MGE more

Very glad to say this cigar lived up to the hype. I didn't go nearly as deep on these as I had planned, but I may revisit that. I think they will easily and quickly outpace the MGE. At the moment, not better than the Sublimes but I think down the road these will overtake them. These are worth the price tag, and met expectations. Slightly thinner and I'd say it reflects largely what I want out of a cigar.

I would rate it slightly higher, 94, with clear room to move up the scale. I bet with age these will be classics. At least one box will go down to reach drinking age.
 
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
1,798
Location
PA
Great review.
I'm pissed because my go-to Cuban cigar site doesn't have these available in singles!
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
13
Have a box on the way looking forward to smoking one. Heard outstanding reviews so far, may have to grab a few more boxes.
 
Top