Padron 1964 Anniversary Torpedo Maduro Cigar Review Video

[kaelaria]

This 6×52 stick offers a firm box pressed dark chocolate wrapper with terrific sweet tobacco and spicy aromas. Burn was almost razor sharp all the way down with a perfect draw giving just the right amount of resistance for an easy cool draw. Flavors were plentiful to say the least with many transition points throughout from beginning to end. They were all exceptionally well blended together and smooth, including coffee, cream, earth, pepper, sweet tobacco, touches of spice and hints of cocoa at points. Total burn time to the nub was 1:15.

http://cigarobsession.com/2009/12/23/padron-1964-anniversary-torpedo-maduro-cigar-review/

 

[tenuki]

Gosh, how does everyone smoke these things so fast?!?! Great review, that picture makes me want to eat the damn cigar.

 

[USNStoops]

Excellent review and video. I may be alone when I say this but I have always enjoyed these more then the 1926. It may just because this is a little bit cheaper and so it hurts less to smoke I am not sure.

 

[kaelaria]

I was actually shocked this went so fast - not at all like the other Padron's I've had. Certainly not a bad thing, just surprising! I like the 1964's better as well - I can't take the really full strength stuff.

 

[ctaylor]

These are one of my favorites, another nice video review brother

 

[Gokian]

Awesome cigar and awesome review.

 

[WkndSmoker]

Yummy!

 

[Alwayslit]

MMMMMMMMMM.....Padron. Nice review. Great stick to smoke!!

 

[JukkaN]

I love Padron's, almost as much as best Cuban's. They are wicked, awesome and great.

 

[carbolicsmoke]

Excellent review and video. I may be alone when I say this but I have always enjoyed these more then the 1926. It may just because this is a little bit cheaper and so it hurts less to smoke I am not sure.

I concur. Regardless of price I have always preferred the 1964 to the 26 in the this series

 

[dpricenator]

Excellent review and video. I may be alone when I say this but I have always enjoyed these more then the 1926. It may just because this is a little bit cheaper and so it hurts less to smoke I am not sure.

I was actually shocked this went so fast - not at all like the other Padron's I've had. Certainly not a bad thing, just surprising! I like the 1964's better as well - I can't take the really full strength stuff.

I concur. Regardless of price I have always preferred the 1964 to the 26 in the this series

The 64 is my all time fav. the 26 is an awesome smoke, but a bit too storng to land in my top 5. That is a great picture.

 

[mav_sd]

64s are my preference as well.

Great review Bryan!

 

[terrantheman]

I'm a 64 guy myself, can't explain it really I think there might be more complexity???

 

[BrandonJ]

Thanks for the review... 64s are my favorite as well..

 

[rick12string]

Gosh, how does everyone smoke these things so fast?!?! Great review, that picture makes me want to eat the damn cigar.

+1
That's a 2 hr smoke for me.

Thanks for the review. I love Padron annies. Never smoke one I didn't thoroughly enjoy.

 

[kaelaria]

I expected 2+ hours as well - but nope, not even close for the torp in this case!

 

[TheCigarKid]

Nice review Bryan, always loved these sticks myself. I'm more of a fan of the 1926's creamy smoothness, but loves th. 64's spice and complexity.

 

[okia42]

Great review. Thanks

 

[jviking52]

Thanks for the review.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bigbwalls]

Great review of a great cigar.