What's new
  • BOTL UPCOMING MAINTENANCE

    Hi Everyone, as mentioned in my introduction post, BOTL needs quite a bit of updating, patching and whatever else I might come across. Over time BOTL may be unreachable on occasion as I do migrations or updates, etc. Just be patient - we'll be back! I'll generally try to keep these maintenances until later in the evenings.

Porktenderloin Review

r3db4r0n

BoM Jan '11
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,190
Location
Ontario, Canada
Delivered unassumingly in cellophane, without a band and nothing to distinguish it other than its rich dark wrapper and the small pigtail that adorns its triple cap, the Tatuaje Pork tenderloin is almost a cigar without the needs of introduction. The latest in Pete Johnson's meat locker series, this is a robustoesque cigar measuring in at 5 1/8x52 and has been described as a “large J21”, although the blend, apparently based on the one used in the J21, would prove (at least to me) to be considerably different.

Upon closer inspection, the Connecticut Broadleaf wrapper gives off that classic deep dark and oil hue, the kind of look that just makes your mouth water a tad when you take the cigar out of the wrapper – perhaps that is the idea behind the name ;) Some large veining is apparent, but there are no other imperfections and the cigar is packed well with a nice give to the body, so I have doubts that there will be difficulty with the burn.







Pre-Light: Freshly removed from the cellophane, cocoa and light coffee notes rise up from the body as if I just put on a cup of hot chocolate and threw some whole beans in the grinder, notes from the foot are equally as aromatic, though somewhat stronger with a hint of spice. Clipping cap gives way to an easy draw with mild cocoa, espresso tones mixed with spice.



Light: The light is initially a spice bomb leaving quite the tingle on the palate while light cocoa and coffee nuances dance faintly in the background. The aroma is rather floral sharing dry cocoa and vanilla fragrances that are similar to the notes perceptible on the draw.



First Third: Spice remains ever present throughout the first third, not having died down as I expected it would, although it adds an interesting paring with the semi sweet cocoa and what has become a strong black coffee aftertaste - unique notes that I don't often find together in a cigar. The expelled smoke offers yet another unique paring as dry cocoa and leather come together for a surprisingly pleasant meld. The burn is showing some deviation, but is good for the most part and the ash has dropped just as it kissed the inch and a half mark.





Second Third: Midway through the second third, there is little change from the first, spice is mild but still present and semi sweet cocoa is still in the midst, however the black coffee flavor has died away for the most part leaving almond and leather on the finish. Interestingly, the expelled smoke has changed to marry with the draw some what, cocoa and leather are still present but almond seems have joined now as well. Unfortunately the burn has deviated somewhat severely towards the end of this third warranting a touch up and the ash has dropped at only an inch.





Final Third: Approaching the nub, spice has pulled ahead in force almost snuffing out the cocoa that shone rather brightly in the first two thirds, leaving leather and almond behind to take over what is left of the profile. Despite the changes in the draw, the retro-hale hangs on firmly to cocoa and leather that have been present now for some time. The burn has improved some, though there is still some deviation towards the nub, however an inch of ash hangs on tightly with a little less than an inch towards the cut.







Down to the cut yet again



Final Thoughts: The first thoughts that come to mind when I think of my experience with this cigar can generally summed up as “wow, this was great, but I wish it had lasted longer”. While the Tenderloin presented great flavor and hearty complexity, I found my self expecting more time to enjoy this cigar given its size, but after only an hour I was surprised to find my self already at the nub. I wouldn't discourage anyone from buying this cigar given that the $8 price tag is relatively inexpensive, though for the money other equally enjoyable and longer lasting smokes can be sought out.

Total Smoking time was roughly an hour.



Thanks for reading!
 

Shmear

Megan the Great
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
4,064
Location
"Paradise" City, Mexico
What tha hell man?! Hahahaha... grab a tooth pick and stick it in there so that you don't burn your fingers... and mouth... hey! Don't you burn your lips??? I do, when I get to the nub.

Anyhow... sound's like a punchin' cigar! Thanks for the review! ;)
 

r3db4r0n

BoM Jan '11
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
2,190
Location
Ontario, Canada
What tha hell man?! Hahahaha... grab a tooth pick and stick it in there so that you don't burn your fingers... and mouth... hey! Don't you burn your lips??? I do, when I get to the nub.

Anyhow... sound's like a punchin' cigar! Thanks for the review! ;)
I've become adept at the "not burning your self under the stress of extreme nubbage" technique ;)

Haha, Thanks Meg!
 

Docbp87

Smoke Into Oblivion
Rating - 100%
23   0   0
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
1,771
Location
Richmond, Va
Shawn, thanks for this review of yet another Tatuaje cigar I missed :closedmou

Awesome photos as always my friend. Seriously, you need a proper website where I can quickly pull up your reviews when I need to reference them :innocent:
 

njstone

BoM January 2010
Rating - 100%
167   0   0
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
8,110
Location
St. Paul, MN
Thanks for this review, bro. For me, that 1-hour smoking time is actually GOOD NEWS, as it means I should actually have time to smoke one in my typical window of opportunity. I hadn't tried yet because it looked like a minimum 90-minute cigar to me. Thanks!
 

danthebugman

BoM Nov '10
Rating - 100%
124   0   0
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
7,365
Location
Joplin, MO
Great review on a tasty cigar Shawn :thumbsup:.

Seriously, you need a proper website where I can quickly pull up your reviews when I need to reference them :innocent:
Just visit his profile and on the right in the mini statistics box, under reviews, simply click show all. Done :grin:.

Dan
 

TheCigarKid

Cigaraholic
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
1,207
Damn, that only lasted you an hour to the little nub? The PT I smoked burned super slow! Kinda' like the Eastie that just lasted me an easy two hours of bliss.

Thanks for the review!
 

KPP

Rating - 100%
73   0   0
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
1,397
Location
Vancouver WA
If it's anything like the couple i've tried...the draw is quite loose, and it did burn fast for me as a result...had to take decent puffs just to get the amount of smoke I prefer.

Draw wasn't terrible by any means, just didn't have the minimal resistance that I usually look for in an ideal draw. Seen others comment to that as well, and I can certainly attest to that.


GREAT review by the way....really curious to see how these will age.
 

Thegreekone

Banned
Rating - 100%
76   0   0
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
2,576
Location
Cleveland!
Shawn, as you know, I just smoked one of these last week. GREAT PICS, GREAT REVIEW, but mine took 1:40! While I think you review is right on the flavor profile, I am amazed you zapped that thing in 60 minutes.

I mean, I got a lot of spicy and complex cream with the spice, and some chocolate, too. My cigars tend to burn like that when I smoke too fast. Don't get me wrong, I had to restrain myself while smoking it I loved it so much.

My ash lasted 3 inches and the burn was razor. That said, we both know cigars are different and we all pace ourselves differently given the cigar, mood, time limits, context...blah, blah, blah. You know what I mean.

Great review.
 

Craig Mac

BoM 4/10 7/11 12/14
Rating - 100%
446   0   0
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
9,494
Location
Hampton Roads VA
GREAT PICS, GREAT REVIEW, but mine took 1:40! While I think you review is right on the flavor profile, I am amazed you zapped that thing in 60 minutes.
Must be cold in Canada :dunno: When I had my first one at the lounge three of us spent at least an hour and a half smoking these.


Nice review Shawn!
 

mwlabel

BoM July '13
Rating - 100%
84   0   0
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Messages
5,699
Location
Midwest!
Excellent review brother. I was also a little surprised by the one hour smoke time, but then again - it is getting cold out. I tend to puff a little faster in the chilly weather
 
Top