I'm split on the whole issue. While I don't like someone blowing cigarette smoke in my face while I'm trying to enjoy a meal, I also would like the priveledge of smoking a cigar at an establishment once in a while. Smoking bans also make it harder and harder to continue the hobby.
:thumbsup:That's pretty much how I feel as well...I do enjoy being able to eat my meals now without the smell of cigarette smoke, and even when I was a cigarette smoker, I did not smoke in restraunts because I felt that it detracted from my meal, and I didn't want to sit in a smoking section and be completely enveloped in smoke. Though it is nice to be able to go to a restraunt, eat my meal, then head to the bar and have a nice cigar.
drew
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:I believe the property owner should have the right to decide whether he allows smoking. The customer has the right to decide which establishment to patronize. The employee has the right to decide where they want to work and the employer should be allowed to hire as he wishes.
Very well put. The establishment and the patron should make the decision. If I want a smoke free hotel room, I can stay at a Marriott which is all smoke free now; but its my choice not some idiot legislating what I can and cant do. Let the market decide. I don't like to sit next to a table full of cigarettes at dinner either so I chose smoke free resturants when out of California where EVERTHING is smoke free. Again, my choice.I believe the property owner should have the right to decide whether he allows smoking. The customer has the right to decide which establishment to patronize. The employee has the right to decide where they want to work and the employer should be allowed to hire as he wishes.
And for all these years, I thought it was Al Jolson... :yes:...as Bachman Turner Overdrive would say, "You Aint Seen Nothing Yet!!"
Free choice---what a radical opinion that is.:agreeclenI believe the property owner should have the right to decide whether he allows smoking. The customer has the right to decide which establishment to patronize. The employee has the right to decide where they want to work and the employer should be allowed to hire as he wishes.
The talk radio guys in MS have been saying this for some time now. It just makes me mad when i think about the gov't telling a business owner what to do with a LEGAL product.I believe the property owner should have the right to decide whether he allows smoking. The customer has the right to decide which establishment to patronize. The employee has the right to decide where they want to work and the employer should be allowed to hire as he wishes.