What's new
  • I've said this before - but this is just a reminder. I'll be breaking BOTL over time in order to get it into a far better place. Just be patient if you can't reach us! We'll be back

Surgeon General's Report Called ‘Unscientific' and Potentially Unethical

Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
353
A renowned member of the Boston University School of Public Health and members of the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association are challenging as unscientific and potentially unethical this week's report from the Office of Dr. Regina Benjamin, the U.S. Surgeon General, about the effects of tobacco smoke.

Columbus, Georgia (Vocus/PRWEB) December 15, 2010

A renowned member of the Boston University School of Public Health and members of the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association are challenging as unscientific and potentially unethical this week's report from the Office of Dr. Regina Benjamin, the U.S. Surgeon General, about the effects of tobacco smoke.

The report said that even brief exposure to secondhand smoke – as from one cigarette - can cause cardiovascular disease, trigger acute cardiac events and can damage one's DNA and lead to cancer. These and other parts of the report are being challenged by the IPCPR which is comprised of some 2,000 members who are primarily small family businesses that operate neighborhood cigar stores or manufacture premium cigars, pipes, tobacco and related accoutrements.

“The mixed signals and misinformation coming from Dr. Benjamin's office lead one to question everything they say and do,” said Chris McCalla, legislative director of the IPCPR.
McCalla cited the fact that one of the first actions of President Barack Obama's administration was to push through draconian increases in tobacco taxes to fund an expanded children's healthcare program. Then the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act was passed, giving new powers to the Federal Drug Administration to reduce smoking in the United States. Now, the Surgeon General is saying, in effect, that walking past a smoker on the street could cause a person to develop cardiovascular disease and cancer.

“It is simply untrue to assert that brief exposure to secondhand smoke can cause such results,” added Prof. Michael Siegel of Boston University's School of Public Health. “If there is no safe level of exposure to any carcinogen, that would include exposure to automobile exhaust, the sun's rays, benzene, radon in homes, arsenic in drinking water and many other everyday items.”
Prof. Siegel, who is not associated with the tobacco industry or IPCPR, also said those statements are untrue and that nothing in the actual report supports those assertions.

“There is nothing in the report itself which … supports the assertions that a brief exposure to secondhand smoke can cause cardiovascular disease or cancer. These assertions … have been manufactured to create a sense of public hysteria, but they are unsupported by any science whatsoever,” he wrote in his blog at http://www.tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com on Dec. 13, 2010. “This is the second time that the Office of the Surgeon General has misrepresented and distorted the science of … secondhand smoke. The press release which accompanied the Surgeon General's 2006 report on secondhand smoke made the same false assertion,” he said.

McCalla also cited the fact that, prior to her nomination as U.S. Surgeon General, Dr. Benjamin served as a trustee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation which contributes tens of millions of dollars every year to promote smoking bans and fund anti-tobacco groups in the United States and internationally.

“Why is this a potential conflict of interest? Because the foundation's sister organization is Johnson & Johnson, maker of Nicorette, a nicotine replacement product,” he said.
 

SuprHasan

I'm finished with cigars
Rating - 100%
53   0   0
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Messages
1,361
Next thing you know, Americans will have to pay over $400/kg in tax for buying tobacco products like we do in Oz.
Scumbags! The lot of them! :angryteet :cursing: :argh:
 

njstone

BoM January 2010
Rating - 100%
167   0   0
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
8,110
Location
St. Paul, MN
I'm glad some scientists are finally showing enough balls to come out against this wholly unscientific hysteria. They're simply trying to justify ever-increasing taxes by telling bold-faced lies. Someone should ask the President--a smoker--to comment.
 

mcroom

RV Wizard
Rating - 100%
53   0   0
Joined
Jan 25, 2009
Messages
6,173
Location
Chattanooga, Tn
I just hope the truth comes out and it gets as much media time as the propaganda this administration is trying to shovel out.
 

Greg

BoM October 2006
Rating - 100%
119   0   0
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
10,894
Location
West, By God, Virginia
Michael Siegel (the BUSPH Professor), far from an advocate of pro-indoor smoking (read the bold), however, he has published numerous papers citing flawed scientific findings by anti-smoking groups. He's spot on about that:

The dissemination of inaccurate information by anti-smoking groups to the public in support of smoking bans is unfortunate because it may harm the tobacco control movement by undermining its credibility, reputation, and effectiveness. Disseminating inaccurate information also represents a violation of basic ethical principles that are a core value of public health practice that cannot and should not be sacrificed, even for a noble end such as protecting nonsmokers from secondhand smoke exposure. How the tobacco control movement responds to this crisis of credibility will go a long way towards determining the future effectiveness of the movement and its ability to continue to save lives and protect the public's health.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17927828
 

WhiteWolfIndulgence

Prince Sascha
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
336
Location
Atlanta, GA
Just saw an article on PipesMagazine.com that basically said the campaign against smoking is basically a way to line the pockets of politicians by creating an irrational fear.

If there were any real value the American Cancer Society would have MORE money if I understood correctly.

S
 

danthebugman

BoM Nov '10
Rating - 100%
124   0   0
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
7,365
Location
Joplin, MO
I absolutely abhor faulty scientific studies, no matter what the field. Perhaps it's the scientist in me, but when someone fudges some numbers or draws conclusions not supported by the data...I wanna smack 'em in the face :argue:.

Citizens are pissed off and are not going to take this shit anymore. If voting doesn't work, they will take more drastic options.
I propose a massive HERF in front of the White House :cbig:. Got a Tat for ya Mr President :grin:.

Dan
 
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
895
Location
Houston, TX
I absolutely abhor faulty scientific studies, no matter what the field. Perhaps it's the scientist in me, but when someone fudges some numbers or draws conclusions not supported by the data...I wanna smack 'em in the face :argue:.

Dan
Probably because it affects the credibility of every single field of science.

There is a special place in science hell for "scientists" that work for lobbies.
 
Top