What's new
  • BOTL UPCOMING MAINTENANCE

    Hi Everyone, as mentioned in my introduction post, BOTL needs quite a bit of updating, patching and whatever else I might come across. Over time BOTL may be unreachable on occasion as I do migrations or updates, etc. Just be patient - we'll be back! I'll generally try to keep these maintenances until later in the evenings.

Possible Millitary Tobacco Ban

jmatkins

BoM January 08
Rating - 99%
159   1   0
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
10,234
Location
Shrewsbury, Ma
I am suprised that it has taken them this long to start this project. It will take some time but it will pass at some point.
 
Rating - 100%
10   0   0
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
1,530
Location
Beaumont, CA
Lovely!!!

The broke dick military (P***y decision makers, not the grunts in the field) is trying to help the troops. Oh f**king goodie. Perhaps the brass should focus on killing people and breaking things...they haven't done that effectively for 60+ years.

Jason
 

openendstraight

Grand Corona
Rating - 100%
118   0   0
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
2,282
Location
Las Vegas
First off, you guys keep saying this will or will not ever get passed. It will never even have to be voted on, Defense Secretary Robert Gates or President Obama could put this in place if he wishes, and if he does it would take an act if Congress to change it.

Second, I have spent more than my share of time on military bases, and I would say that atleast 75% of Marines smoke. I did not, but I did drink more then than I ever have. I have no problem if they decide to make all bases and military transportation smoke free. You all are looking at this from a cigar stand point, they are not as harmful as those cancer sticks they are smoking. I'd this is put in place, look for liquor to be next.

For those of you that say we live in a free country, we don't. We live in a Democratict country.

Most of these young guys and gals in the Military enter between 18 and 20, and are very easily influenced.
 
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
1,035
Location
San Angelo, TX
Half the customers at my local b&m are military. This would put them out of business.

Not to mention what it would do to recruiting.

The military has already done quite enough to discourage tobacco use. I don't see a need to go further.
 

SkinsFanLarry

Craft Beer Addict!
Rating - 100%
78   0   0
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
14,355
Not only that but I've also read smoking marijuana or at least a mix of marijuana and tobacco increases one's ability to see in the dark. It was a unofficial observance of some indigenous fishermen somewhere in the world. They would smoke up before they went out for the night in pitch black but could find their way around. When they didn't smoke they couldn't see.
See, they can save money that way and wouldn't have to buy "night vision" goggles!
 
Rating - 100%
10   0   0
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
1,530
Location
Beaumont, CA
First off, you guys keep saying this will or will not ever get passed. It will never even have to be voted on, Defense Secretary Robert Gates or President Obama could put this in place if he wishes, and if he does it would take an act if Congress to change it.

Second, I have spent more than my share of time on military bases, and I would say that atleast 75% of Marines smoke. I did not, but I did drink more then than I ever have. I have no problem if they decide to make all bases and military transportation smoke free. You all are looking at this from a cigar stand point, they are not as harmful as those cancer sticks they are smoking. I'd this is put in place, look for liquor to be next.

For those of you that say we live in a free country, we don't. We live in a Democratict country.

Most of these young guys and gals in the Military enter between 18 and 20, and are very easily influenced.
What's up Don.

Would this really have to go through Congress? If I am correct, military personnel is not subject to our normal laws...they are subject to the UCMJ. Couldn't the president pass this down through the chain of command without dealing with Congress. I'm not an attorney, so I don't know. As the first lady, Hillary Clinton imposed a "non-smoking" rule in the White House. Did that have to go through congress? In my opinion, the White House is a military base. If that ban did not have to go through Congress, how is any other military base different? Let me know, you are always on top of these things like this so I would love to know the correct answer.

Jason
 

openendstraight

Grand Corona
Rating - 100%
118   0   0
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
2,282
Location
Las Vegas
It will never even have to be voted on, Defense Secretary Robert Gates or President Obama could put this in place if he wishes, and if he does it would take an act if Congress to change it.

Like I said in my first post, this doesn't have to go through Congress, President Obama could do this bt exuctive order, and if he does it would take an act of congress to change that order. Not only that Bags is correct Military personal are governed under a different set of rules and laws, the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice).

So in theory Secretary of Defense Robert Gates or the Secretary of the Navy (people don't realize he is the third most powerful man in the Military chain of command, right under Gates) could insitute this without approval from anyone else, the only difference being they can be over ruled by Congress or the President.
 
Rating - 100%
10   0   0
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
1,530
Location
Beaumont, CA
It will never even have to be voted on, Defense Secretary Robert Gates or President Obama could put this in place if he wishes, and if he does it would take an act if Congress to change it.

Like I said in my first post, this doesn't have to go through Congress, President Obama could do this bt exuctive order, and if he does it would take an act of congress to change that order. Not only that Bags is correct Military personal are governed under a different set of rules and laws, the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice).

So in theory Secretary of Defense Robert Gates or the Secretary of the Navy (people don't realize he is the third most powerful man in the Military chain of command, right under Gates) could insitute this without approval from anyone else, the only difference being they can be over ruled by Congress or the President.
Ok, that is what I thought. I must have misread the Congress part in your first post.

Jason
 

n.olson

Veteran Eccentric
Rating - 100%
67   0   0
Joined
Jul 14, 2009
Messages
1,565
Location
Salem, Or
might as well be a voice of reason/anger in all of this. this is no different that anything else our leaders in the military do, and on all the military sponsored channels we got in iraq, colonels and sergeant majors were doing PSA's about quitting, they are taking out ads in the ARMY/NAVY?etc. times to quit, it's everywhere. the military can (and will, within my career) and it is what it is, the main push is on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, but i haven't investigated enough to see about cigars. but even in the past five years, i have been seeing a HUGE pushback against smoking, cessation programs, to first sergeants and platoon sergeants banning it outright to their soldiers, which again is well within their right. just hope they don't take my beloved cigars away....
 

mthhurley

BoM December 2011
Rating - 100%
208   0   0
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
1,522
Location
Naperville IL
Looks like they backed down on this one:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The defense secretary will not ban smoking by troops in war zones despite a recommendation to do so by a Pentagon-commissioned study.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates says he does not want to compound stress in combat zones by banning smoking.

Secretary Robert Gates' decision stems from concern about the stress troops face, said his spokesman.

"We are fighting two wars right now, using a force that we are demanding more of than we ever have before. They are under enormous stress and strain, and the secretary does not want to compound that stress by taking away from them one of the few outlets they have to relieve that stress," Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Wednesday.
 
Rating - 100%
110   0   0
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
4,845
Location
Harrisburg, PA
At least someone has a half a brain cell that at that level of government. I'd like to see those white coat wearing prius driving ass eaters run around with 70lbs extra in 110 degree heat. Then after living through the day, not want some sort of stress reliever. They know smoking increases the production of dopamine and seratonin which calm and cause a pleasurable feeling respectively. If you ask me they should send out "morale girls" with the troops. If they don't want them smoking give them an alternative stress reliever. hahaha.
 
Last edited:
Top