What's new

UF-4 vs UF-13

Rating - 100%
153   0   0
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
2,815
Location
Surprise, AZ
OK, I admit I'm not the best at searching out info. Obviously I can't find what I'm looking for so here is the question:
Whats the difference in these?
I have smoked a couple UF-4 and have 1 UF-13.
 

hdroadglide

BoM x 2, BoY 2011
Rating - 100%
514   0   0
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
10,486
Location
south of KCMO
the uf 4 was originally the jd 4 which was a more or less "private" blend for jonathan. very similar to the t 52 but with more ligero so it has more punch.
the uf 13 was another test blend, but don't really know much about it.
i do know i want MORE of the uf 4's, so if you don't like them............
 
Rating - 100%
153   0   0
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
2,815
Location
Surprise, AZ
the uf 4 was originally the jd 4 which was a more or less "private" blend for jonathan. very similar to the t 52 but with more ligero so it has more punch.
the uf 13 was another test blend, but don't really know much about it.
i do know i want MORE of the uf 4's, so if you don't like them............
Ha:headroll: Love the UF4 myself. Think I'm down to 2 left. If it means that much to you send me your addy.
 

sofc

I hate E and Chef
Rating - 100%
276   0   0
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
8,280
the uf 4 was originally the jd 4 which was a more or less "private" blend for jonathan. very similar to the t 52 but with more ligero so it has more punch.
the uf 13 was another test blend, but don't really know much about it.
i do know i want MORE of the uf 4's, so if you don't like them............
I thought jd4 had much less punch. UF 4 was a little too harsh for my delicate palate.

All that means is more UF 4 for you left.
 

orangedog

Navin R Johnson
Rating - 100%
83   0   0
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
2,504
Location
On A Plane
Doesn't that really depend on what U * F is? :devilhead
Well... I'm piggybacking off of Drew Estate's work here, as the math in the below image was pilfered from their factory computer system on a recent visit by an un-named BOTL. However, I added in the annotations to make it easier to follow:



/end threadjack
 

iCraig

Cigars, hockey, and beer.
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
3,213
Well... I'm piggybacking off of Drew Estate's work here, as the math in the below image was pilfered from their factory computer system on a recent visit by an un-named BOTL. However, I added in the annotations to make it easier to follow:



/end threadjack
:applause:
 

BrooksW

BoM June '09
Rating - 100%
131   0   0
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
2,530
Location
Dallas, Texas
the uf 4 was originally the jd 4 which was a more or less "private" blend for jonathan. very similar to the t 52 but with more ligero so it has more punch.
the uf 13 was another test blend, but don't really know much about it.
i do know i want MORE of the uf 4's, so if you don't like them............
Right...

JD4=MF4=UF4
MF13=UF13

The UF13 is the better cigar, IMHO...almost the perfect Liga at that size and RG...

~brooks
 
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
407
T52-4 was the final head to head blend that was competing internally with T52-3 to become the T52 final blend.

T52-4 was exceptional, in fact JD and I both liked it a slight bit better, but we were concerned that it tended to overpower some of the nuances in the liga and that we were sacrificing flavors for strength, so we ultimately decided that the T52-3 would be the final T52 blend.

JD for his own smoking pleasure kept having T52-4s made, but we banded them as JD4 so as to not cause confusion in the factory or with those he shared them with.

After he started handing them out, he decided that he didn't like putting his personal name on the product, so we started ringing them with MF-4 - it stood for what you think it does.

In the factory we kept tinkering with the T52-4/JD4/MF-4 blend to try to improve it (in our opinion) - goal was to keep the octane, but restore the depth of flavors... so we made a variety of minor liga tweaks and vitola changes to try and get it "perfect".

The result was the MF-13 - a robusto format. I think the MF-13 is better, not sure where JD stands on this - truth is the difference is so very minor between the two cigars I doubt most folks could even tell there was any difference unless they smoked them side by side... and maybe not even then, but we can tell... or so we tell ourselves. ;>

We started sharing both MF-4s and MF-13s at events and out of our pockets and they started to get some buzz online.

JD came to me one day with a My Father cigar and pointed out that Pepin's rings have an MF in the center of them. How both of us missed this is kinda crazy since we both smoke a lot of their cigars, but we did. So we decided to change the name to UF out of respect - we take pride in not knowingly copying others, so we rebanded all the MFs as UFs on our own accord.

UF stands for "Unico Fuerte."

So MF-4 = UF-4 and MF-13 = UF-13.

Netiher blend is really in testing per se, both are finalized blends. It just that neither is being produced for retail at this point.

We would like to release the cigar this year, but can't commit to doing so until we are confident we can get T52, Dirty Rats and L40s delivered on a regular basis to our customers as the UF-13 shares the same Stalk Cut Habano capa.

Now you know more than 99% of DE does about the lineage of UF-13... ;>

BR,

Steve Saka
Prez, Drew Estate
 
Top