This is the last I'll say of this because this isn't in the right forum (and I'm not meaning to cause a debate), but your opening statement shows you don't understand what he's saying at all. I'm not trying to be offensive in any way, so please don't take it that way; I am not trying to argue. Krishnamurti preached for the utter lack of a "belief system" in our lives, and if you tried to make a belief system out of any of his words, in any way, shape, or form, your actions are the antithesis of what he preached. There are no actions you can take to ever see truth; you cannot seek it out. You can only find truth through a silent mind, and this can only be found through constant attention of yourself; constant, nonjudgmental attention, because judgement in itself is a result of a belief. Truth is also ever-changing.
All of the individuals you spoke of are a result of a world of belief or non-belief, because non-belief is no different than belief; it is just the belief in no belief whatsoever. Freedom from belief is something entirely different. A revolution of the individual toward freedom from belief doesn't create more of these individuals you speak of, because it is belief at its very core that produces them; belief seperates, divides, and creates conflict. If you watch your mind attentively all the time you'll see how your belief in this or your belief in that, whatever it is, however small or large, creates constant conflict within. These are the things Krishnamurti speaks of.
Last thing I'll say, you speak of "self," and self, according to him, is the result of belief. Freedom from belief is freedom from "self" in a sense. If you understood what he is saying, you would never reference "self" and enlightenment in the same breath; self is a creation of the mind. Please re-read his speeches and writings. Again, I'm not trying to argue or insult; most people do not understand what he has said, so it's important to correct misunderstandings.
